task4 done
This commit is contained in:
@@ -176,6 +176,21 @@ At very high SNR, pilot tracking can also have little visible impact because the
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 4
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.1
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
The MCS sweep shows that higher MCS values require higher SNR to achieve the same packet error rate. Lower MCS values are more robust and can reach PER values around $10^{-3}$ within the simulated SNR range, but this comes at the cost of a lower data rate. For MCS 12 and MCS 13, the PER does not fall below $10^{-1}$ in the observed SNR range. In particular, MCS 13 still shows a high packet error rate around 34 dB SNR where as MCS 0 reaches PER $10^{-3}$, so it is not reliable under these channel conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
Reflecting this analysis: Higher MCS values tend to be more sensitive to NTN Doppler and residual CFO.
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.2
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Analyzing the bandwidth sweep, the observed PER improves as the channel bandwidth increases. In this simulation setup, CBW320 reaches a PER of approximately nearly $10^{-3}$ below 10 dB SNR, while CBW20 requires roughly 34-35 dB SNR to reach a comparable PER. This indicates that, for the fixed APEP length and MCS used here, a wider channel bandwidth improves the link robustness in the simulated NTN channel.
|
||||
|
||||
So in this simulation a higher bandwith improves PER.
|
||||
|
||||
<div style="page-break-after: always;"></div>
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 5
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user